Search the site...

COLME AARON
  • Movie Reviews
  • Yearly Top 10
    • Top Movies of 2021
    • Top Movies of 2020
    • Top Movies of 2019
    • Top Movies 2018
  • About
  • Movie Reviews
  • Yearly Top 10
    • Top Movies of 2021
    • Top Movies of 2020
    • Top Movies of 2019
    • Top Movies 2018
  • About

Movies In RevIew

Creed 2 - Review

11/24/2018

Comments

 
Picture
Release Date: November 21, 2018​​​​​​​
Not Quite a Knockout

​There are only a few movie franchises that people still care about from the 1970s. Tentpoles, like Star Wars, are going through a rough time and the Alien brand has all but killed itself. So how can a film series about boxing, one of the most hated topics by movie audiences, still be going strong? Creed not only revitalized interest in the genre but did so by paying respect to what came before while completely updating it. Instead of being stuck in the golden decades of the 70s and 80s, Creed shoved boxing in the 21st century. So, without writer-director Ryan Coogler, who moved on to make Black Panther, can Creed continue to be the boxing series that people go to see?

To get comparisons out of the way, Creed 2 is not as good as the first movie, though it tries really hard to be. It loses some authenticity in the depiction of its characters and how it presents itself. The foundation Creed set up still holds up though; the great casting does a lot to keep this newest installment afloat.
It seems that people who have seen the other Rocky movies had a less enjoyable time watching this one. They say it reuses plot points from the previous films with only minor changes. While these people still enjoyed the movie, they felt like this story was weighed down since it didn't reinvent old tropes. As someone who has not seen the other Rocky movies, this was not a problem for me. That doesn't mean the movie is devoid of problems, but the familiarity problem was nonexistent.

What did come off as problematic, was the story construction and camera placement. The story felt like an attempt to accurately represent these characters instead of being definitive. This probably has to do with Sylvester Stallone writing the screenplay since he did not for the first movie. It beats you over the head with dialogue that is repeated over and over again which just gets tiring. The camera placement was also pretty average compared to the first movie. It mostly just copies the first installment and doesn't do anything inspired.

But this movie isn't down for the count. People were clapping and laughing with this movie till the very end. It does take a while for the movie to find its groove, but when it does, it pulls you in. I have to praise the movie for being able to create moments of tension. The movie makes you invested in the main character's journey, even if you think you know how it ends. It doesn't always fire on all cylinders, but when it does, be prepared to be brought to the edge of your seat.

Creed 2 also has one of the best training montages I have ever seen. It might look like all the ones that came before, but it takes out all the campiness. In its place, stands very emotional, dramatic scenes of incredible strength. It communicates to the audience that this isn't a journey of growth but a fight for survival.

Creed 2 is definitely worth seeing in theaters. I hope you get to experience an atmosphere of people laughing and holding their breath as I did. I don't know if I want another movie, but if there were to be another installment, take Stallone off the writing team.
7.5/10
​No more sons fighting each other please

Comments

Ralph Breaks the Internet - Review

11/24/2018

Comments

 
Picture
Release Date: November 21, 2018​​​​​​
It Broke Itself

You can never go wrong with a Disney movie, they create wonderful worlds and have the best animation in the business. Wreck it Ralph brought to life a magical place and an unlikely friendship. It was entertaining and "hip with 30-year-olds" by including old video game characters. Its sequel, Ralph Breaks the Internet, is poised to continue its fantastic worldbuilding and keep the same heart the first movie brought to life. While I was stunned by the creativity put on display, Ralph broke his franchise.

The best thing about this movie is how it was able to create a place out of all the websites people use in their day-to-day life. The way the sites were imagined for the movie was inspiring to see. It had fun building a city out of them and made it feel like a real place. The compliments end there.
The rest of it fell into a few different categories. There were large stretches of runtime that bored me out of my mind. Creatively bankrupt ideas or just uncompelling plot points littered this movie. If I wasn't being bored to death, I was cringing at how many references the movie tried to show off. I don't want to see Miranda Sings react to being disconnected from the internet, I don't want to see a cameo by Fortnite, or how to make money online by being an internet celebrity. And the most damaging thing about this movie came down to it simply not having a good story.

​​Some people will say that movies for children shouldn't be complex, that they need to be easy for kids to understand. Pixar is a pretty good example of how this sentiment is wrong, along with Disney Animations' previous movies like Zootopia. Having characters run around for an hour and a half doing nothing but showing off all the ways websites were turned into places, isn't a plot. There is barely a story in the movie to criticize. The end of it makes you wait for something important to happen, and even then, it was an homage to a different movie.
​

​Ralph Breaks the Internet doesn't use its runtime to build its characters up. In place of that, it has its characters react to things in a very ‘internet’ way. Whether it's Ralph doing a hot pepper challenge, Vanellope watching a "Which Princess Would Be Your Best Friend" quiz, or dealing with hateful online comments. It seems like content that would literally be made on the internet, not in a Hollywood Production.

When the movie does get around to developing its characters, it does so both hastily and obviously. The movie never lets characters sit with their emotions; it never lets the audience brood with them. Instead, there always has to be an immediate response to everything that happens. Plus, the way the main problem manifests itself is such a movie cliche at this point and it wasn’t even done in an interesting way. Having a bunch of small things group together and form one big monster is something I do not want to see more of.

I was looking forward to enjoying Ralph Breaks the Internet because I liked the first movie so much. A better version of "The Emoji Movie" was what I was expecting, but in the end, I only got a marginally better movie. I guess if you have kids you could take them to see this movie since one in my theater never stopped talking. Overall, this movie was a pretty big let down and the worst movie Disney Animations has made since transitioning to 3D animation.
3/10
Being hip with the kids is cool, right?
Comments

Robin Hood - Review

11/20/2018

Comments

 
Picture
Release Date: November 23, 2018​​​​​​
Another Tale as Old as Time

​The influx in modern tellings of fairy tales doesn’t seem to be slowing down anytime soon. While the financially successful ones come from Disney, they all suffer from not being very good. Robin Hood joins the club and never thinks about straying from the pack. It attempts to retell the story of a thief giving back to the poor, only this time he doesn't really care about the poor people. This reincarnation of the classic story contorts itself, becoming unrecognizable when looking at other movies like it.

​Robin Hood tries to keep most of its action in camera, which is nice. It is not devoid of CG, but most of the big action sets seem to be done practically. This aspect really helped the movie when it came to chase scenes or on location shooting. It created a sense of realism that went a long way into making me believe what I was seeing. When there was CG, it wasn't obtrusive or attention-grabbing.

​There were many things in Robin Hood that I was not expecting, but the most surprising aspect of the movie was theft. I could not believe how many ideas this movie 
stole from other films. It blows my mind how
anyone thought it would be okay to rip off plot points, scenes, action set pieces, and editing styles wholesale. When the movie wasn't ripping off Skyfall, it was trying to be The Dark Knight; while it was focused on being a worse Guy Ritchie movie, it made all of its characters one dimensional. There is no shortage of tropes or cliches that this movie uses to achieve mediocrity.

This is a point of contention for me with this movie. There is a scene really early on that depicts one of the Crusades. It has a small team of archers trying to infiltrate a city and they eventually fall into an ambush. It’s directed like a modern day military movie; complete with being pinned down by enemy fire, moving through hallways, and general modern military tactics. That is not how wars were fought in the 11th century. They didn't have small archer squads go into a city that could call for catapult support and rain rocks from the sky. The addition of a fancy party at a casino didn't rub me the right way either. There were too many modern tropes that didn't belong in a medieval time period.

​This is not a movie you should see, full stop. It honestly offers nothing new or fun to the audience. You would have a much better time seeing the movie it takes all of its style queues from, King Arthur: Legend of the Sword. But just like that movie, it tries to set up a franchise that will never see the light of day. Like I said before, none of the modern fairy tale movies are that good; though Robin Hood is in a league of its own at the very bottom of the list.
4/10
"I’ve been robbed of my time and money" - Anonymous

Comments

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald - Review

11/16/2018

Comments

 
Picture
Release Date: November 16, 2018​​​​​​
How Did it Get Worse?

​A lot of people are excited to see the Wizarding World of Harry Potter continue in a new set of movies. Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them proved that capturing the magic of the original series would be difficult. The first movie did have fans though, and while I don't like it as much anymore, it still has some really fun characters and moments. The Crimes of Grindelwald should have brought to life legendary characters while also expanding on the threads created by the first movie. With expectations so high, a movie far better than the first needed to reclaim the fan fever around the series. I can say, without a doubt in my mind, that The Crimes of Grindelwald is a terrible movie.

I don't know if there are any good aspects of the movie. The directing and cinematography were poor across the board. The soundtrack started off strong but hindered the movie quickly, devolving into an annoying distraction. And the worst offender of them all was the story; it was horrendously bad. All of these terrible aspects joined together, attempt to make a compelling movie rather than being one.
The easiest way to talk about the movie is the story. The Fantastic Beasts series is a backdrop for the first wizard war alluded to in the original Harry Potter saga. Instead of making that the focus, J.K. Rowling decided that pretending the series is about magic animals was a good idea. So the movie splits its attention with animals, love stories, queerbaiting, and war, doing none of them justice. Plus, in an attempt to bring back fans, this movie has included characters from the original set of stories that are extraneous and add nothing.

One moment you are with the characters from the first movie, then you jump to Grindelwald for ten seconds, but don't forget a flashback that isn't needed, ending on new characters that aren't important. The movie wants to be taken seriously, trying to have moments that will take your breath away while also being a character drama. This falls flat because the magical moments are mundane, not really eliciting any childlike wonder. The serious moments miss the mark as well, due to the characters' actions not being indicative of their motivations. In addition to these hindrances, you have the story being too circumstantial. It felt like someone saying, "You know what would be cool", and not having a plan for it.

I guess negative reviews won't keep people away though, as the rotten tomato score has proved. Some might argue that the story is all planned out, that I just need to have faith in the three movies to come. I would shoot back with, that is never the case; things change, and that is not how movies work. This isn't television, books, or any other serialized content, this is movies. Being a movie means you tell a story, and The Crimes of Grindelwald failed in telling a compelling one.
3/10
The actors do a fine job acting, its just all the creative people's fault this movie is bad
Comments

The Grinch - Review

11/9/2018

Comments

 
Picture
Release Date: November 9, 2018​​​​​​
All Grumpy

Adapting a children's book is no small task. It’s has been attempted by many movie studios and most failed in capturing what made those stories special. Now take that difficulty and multiply it by one hundred, because that's how hard it is to adapt a Dr. Seuss book. Illumination Entertainment had their first attempt with The Lorax, which was very engaging to me as a kid; I think that's the same sentiment they were going for with for The Grinch. It adds a lot of plot points and characters not in the book to try to make a full-length movie.

The good news is, this is Illumination's best-looking movie yet. This might have to do with the limited locations featured in the movie, but the attention to detail and quality of models surpass anything else they have made before. Illumination also continues to have great music for their movies from well-known artists; Tyler, The Creator's featured song has become synonymous with the movie. The last compliments I can give this movie have to do with Illumination's creativity and comedy chops. The way they come up with fantastical ideas that bring the world to life is really fun to watch, plus, the visual gags are entertaining as well. 
However, the movie runs into a few problems on its way to grow the Grinch's heart three sizes. It takes detours that don't help portray the lesson trying to be taught by the original story. The Grinch, written by Dr. Seuss, was about a green-haired person who hated Christmas and overcame that hatred when he found out that the holiday was about caring for one another instead of gifts. This movie decided that they needed to add a backstory for the Grinch which overall made him less mean. There are multiple instances where the Grinch is nice, which makes his change seem inevitable. They also add a subplot for Cindy-Lou to have a bigger part in the story but make her motivations too mature. A ten-year-old would not ask Santa for their parent to become happy; that would be too unrealistic in a movie with a Christmas tree the size of a mountain.

If the Grinch is just a lonely person, why wouldn't he change at the end of the story? If he is nice all the time, why wouldn't he give the stolen presents back? The movie hinders itself by making a ton of gags in place of substance. So I had fun watching this movie because of all the silly jokes, but I can't overlook how the story didn't feel right. I could never buy all the "bad" things the Grinch did because he was never terrible. The movie "How the Grinch Stole Christmas" from 1966 is the better animated movie for adapting a classic right. Sure, it has too much motion blur and its not as good as the 30-minute tv-movie from 1966, but at least its almost Christmas season.
5.5/10
"It wont make your heart grow three sizes" - Anonymous
Comments

Bohemian Rhapsody - Review

11/2/2018

Comments

 
Picture
Release Date: November 2, 2018​​​​​​
A Wild Ride

There is no denying the influence Queen has had over movie soundtracks, just one song could propel a trailer into the stratosphere. So a movie about the band's lead singer is sure to draw attention to itself. It probably helps that besides movies, Queen's music was a cultural touchstone and continues to be something people enjoy. These elements are the perfect recipe for intense interest and hopefully a fantastic movie.

The movie's soundtrack is predictably great, even with some songs that are not by Queen. It has all of the major hits from the band including more obscure ones as well. Since all of the music is dubbed over, the actors get to focus on adding flamboyance to their performance. Having great music to perform to really helps bring the music numbers alive. Even outside of these sections, the actors did a great job bringing these people to life on screen. An obvious standout is Rami Malek for his portrayal of Freddie Mercury. He really melts away into the character and leaves a lasting impression.
The portrayal of these characters feel authentic and the story is very engaging, but their depiction could be better. There are a lot of hard cuts that restrict the flow of the movie and make it hard to connect with characters. The use of time jumps is jarring and makes it difficult for the audience to grasp the intimacy of the relationships that they have with one another. It feels like the movie sprints through events for the first half and gradually slows down to the Live Aid event. If the movie were a Queen biopic, it would have ended when they got signed to IEM, allowing the audience to see more of the band’s creative process. But this Freddie Mercury movie has iconic songs drizzled throughout it and ends on a high note.

I wanted to like the movie more than I did. I enjoyed getting to learn about Queen’s history and Freddie's life. It came down to having to squeeze too many important events into the movie which created the rush that hurt my experience watching it. None of these criticisms take away from the real-life events that happened, so when I say that Bohemian Rhapsody is middle of the road movie, I’m only talking about the movie. If you connect to the story on a deep level or are a huge fan of the band, poor editing choices and story structure aren’t going to dissuade you from watching the movie. So with that assessment, I could have waited to watch this at home on a streaming service, but the weekend box office tells a different story.
6/10
A guy peed himself in the theater when I saw this movie... guess it was that good

Comments

    Categories

    All
    20th Century Fox
    A24
    Action
    Adventure
    Amazon
    Animation
    Annapurna
    Blue Sky
    Blumhouse
    Comedy
    Comic Book Movie
    DC
    Detective
    Disney
    Disney+
    Disney Animation
    Drama
    DreamWorks
    Fantasy
    Focus Features
    Foreign Language
    Horror
    Illumination
    Kid's Movie
    Laika
    Legendary
    Lionsgate
    Live Action Fairy Tale
    Lucasfilm
    Marvel
    MGM
    Monster Movie
    Musical
    Neon
    Netflix
    Paramount
    Pixar
    Science Fiction
    Sony
    STX Entertainment
    Thriller
    Universal
    Video Game Movie
    War Movie
    Warner Bros.
    Western Japan Movie
    Zombie Movie

    Archives

    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.